Sex and Suffrage in Britain 1860-1914
By Susan Kingsley Kent[...] Fawcett suspected that the "low position of women generally" under the law was sustained at least in part by those who "prosecute the street walker with the one hand, and with the other elevate to the place of chief magistrate in the town a man who is living in adultery". Motivated by this belief, Fawcett in 1894 embarked upon a semi-public campaign to expose the "ghastly" private behaviour of Henry Cust, MP for Lancashire, who, with the support of the Conservative leadership, proposed to stand for election to Parliament at North Manchester. According to Fawcett, Cust had seduced a young woman of good Lincolnshire family, a Miss Welby. She had become "enceinte", and he deserted her, subsequently offering marriage to another woman. "Miss Welby wrote Cust a despairing, imploring letter", Fawcett explained, "which he spoke of, or showed to other men at the country house he was staying, with odious remarks intended to be facetious. The other men did not take these observations in the spirit they were mad: they told Cus he was a cur". They also informed the father and family of the woman to whom Cust was engaged of his action, and after a bitter dispute "Cust was told that unless he married Miss Welby at once (whom he said he particularly disliked) the whole thing would be made public". Powerful Conservatives refused to allow Cust to stand for Lincolnshire, "but he is thought good enough for North Manchester", Fawcett noted acidly. She informed well-placed people in Manchester of this state of affairs because she "considered that Cust's conduct struck at the root of everything that makes home and marriage sacred, and that to place such a man in a osition of public honour and responsibility would have a very bad effect". She told Cust that "as a woman I have naturally the strongest feeling against men of known bad character being elected to the House of Commons". Eventually. A. J. Balfour, the leader of the Conservatives in the House of Commons, involved himself in the controversy, chastising Fawcett for making the scandal known to influential people in Manchester. He advised her that "as the duties of a Member of Parliament are public ones, the capacity of a Candidate to perform those duties should be in most cases the sole ground of his selection... Private life - the doings of a man in his own home - ought not... to be dragged gratuitously before the public". In response to his assertion that the matter was "of no public concern", Fawcett asked: "Is a man who, in public life, can be suitably described by his intimates as an infernal scoundrel a fit and proper person to be brought forward by his party as a Parliamentary Candidate? I would answer this in the negative". She felt that the private behaviour of men like Cust reflected attitudes toward women that found their way into law and contributed heavily to "the utter rottenness of the whole of public on morals", public opinion that necessarily affected women adversely.
Nessun commento:
Posta un commento